SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (370239)3/12/2003 2:22:49 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
A nuke would be a danger. I suspect that chemical and biological would be less of a problem. All methods of delivery will have short life.

I'd suspect that counter battery technology can figure out launch points within seconds of launch. The command control can get counter munitions targeted and launched in minutes depending upon where.



To: Bill who wrote (370239)3/12/2003 2:23:18 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
The cost is my concern. Let's get it over with. Saddam has already proven he will not disarm.

BW and CW technology basivcally serves a barrier purpose.....Also...BTW....often not mentioned is the fact that our Bradleys and Abrams tanks are outfitted to travel quickly and without harm through chemical barriers.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News