SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Castle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (1250)3/13/2003 1:05:37 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7936
 
If one side violates the agreement the other side is freed from its obligations under the agreement. It doesn't always have to lead to war but it provides a justification for war.

Tim



To: tejek who wrote (1250)3/13/2003 4:56:56 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7936
 
Why does violation of the cease fire agreement have to result in the resumption of the conflict?

What else are you going to do? If you assume the terms of the ceasefire agreement were put there for a reason (and they were in this case); if the terms are violated, there literally is no other choice. You can warn the violator (as we have done for years), but at some point, the war has to be resumed.

Seems fairly obvious.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News