Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (164216)	3/14/2003 1:48:23 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573930

Ted, Stranglely enough, I am somewhere in the middle as well. Its why I am inclined to leave it mostly to the jurisdiction of women. I should think of a similar copout, so that I sound like I have a strength of conviction on this issue. But then, I read that the strength of conviction is something that is not desirable (because our president has it), instead, indecision is desirable... So I will stick with indecision for now... What I find really surprising are people who are adamantly against abortions but just as adamantly for the death penalty. The difference is taking innocent life vs. guilty life. Joe

To: tejek who wrote (164216)	3/14/2003 1:48:55 AM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573930

tejek, re:What I find really surprising are people who are adamantly against abortions but just as adamantly for the death penalty. That's too easy, the unborn are innocents and the condemned are generally considered guilty. I don't know when life begins or if god made them or if they have souls or if it's good policy to not burden folks/society with unwanted children.