SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (20798)3/14/2003 1:17:01 PM
From: E. T.  Respond to of 25898
 
But why, we've seen plenty of other governments disarm and it sure looks a whole lot different than what Saddam is doing right now. Or do you think he's being truthful, all the anthrax was dumped in a hole someplace outside Baghdad in 1991, and of course, there is no paper work to that effect.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (20798)3/14/2003 1:21:21 PM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
re: we don't need to have hundreds of thousands of troops in The Middle East to apply maximum pressure on Saddam....

you mean to say that before Bush put troops there Sadam was actively cooperating with inspectors?

re: he French now say they will agree to a new resolution with a time limit of LESS than 120 days...

until this Monday it is less than 120 days.....



To: stockman_scott who wrote (20798)3/14/2003 2:30:36 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 25898
 
Yet, if Hans Blix says he needs a few months to complete his inspections / verifications shouldn't we be willing to give the time to him...?

No! Saddam has had 12 years to cooperate and disarm. Even in the face of 1441 he still is not cooperative. Time for Saddam to meet Allah.