Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (85850)	3/14/2003 2:41:43 PM
From: jim kelley	Respond to of 93625

Re:"Rambus didn't contribute a dime of effort to the DDR or SDRAM design efforts." Stop whining about your superiors! <g> It is obvious to everyone including the CAFC that the RAMBUS patents did not read on SDRAM or DDR. It is also obvious that the industry decided to STEAL Rambus innovations two at a time from the RDRAM patent. You know that it is the truth. These guys had an "NIH" and "I don't want to pay attitude" and they believed they could rollover tiny Rambus. The RDRAM design is fundamentally superior to DDR. Lots of people at Rambus got their fingers dirty in industry. Tate worked for AMD for years. You seem to be suffering from "education envy" with your complaints about the professors and their educations.<LOL>

To: Bilow who wrote (85850)	3/14/2003 2:44:12 PM
From: Logain Ablar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Carl: The rmbs response to the ftc. ftc.gov You can believe what you want but if the full circut review is denied the next stop for rmbs is $30.

To: Bilow who wrote (85850)	3/14/2003 6:39:22 PM
From: Jdaasoc	Respond to of 93625

Rambus that was started by college professors Just one I belive, Horowitz from MIT & Stanford. Not too shabby kind of places. Farmwald only holds Ph'D from Stanford and doesn't appear to be on any other faculties since graduation. Rest of RMBS founders venture capitalists.

To: Bilow who wrote (85850)	3/14/2003 8:04:04 PM
From: Pat Hughes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

There you go Bilow. Your time here is growing shorter and shorter. You bad mouth "Mom and Pop" yet you post here and have never taken a position either way. Yet, I will continue to remind you of your $2.00 trading system that you were oh so proud of. Do you think "Mom and Pop" waste time on "$2.00 trading systems"? Most "Mom and Pops" make more money than you do....if you are keeping score. I look forward to your New Year's Eve, 11:58 PM, all alone / No friends post. (You'd think one of your "Bridgebuilder" friends would have invited you out?) Your a loser and losers ..... well you know; LOSE!