<PRESIDENT BUSH: Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's welfare not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.>
How much is much, as well as mixing up spending time and money??
< And when I say to him you have used weapons of mass destruction before, we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again. (Applause) >
Who is him, probably Saddamm, but then who is "you"?? as well as "we"?? Same "you" again as the first
one, and then "them"?? the capacities, WMDs or just a general "them"??
<PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, the United States does not relish moving alone, because we live in a world that is increasingly interdependent.>
Yes, alone war on terrorism, or interdependent production of faked papers??
< We would like to be partners with other people.>
Yes, that is why Bush understood that in the war on other people and his own terrorism, it
was smart to go through the gates of UN on UNESCO knees.
<But sometimes we have to be prepared to move alone.>
Dude, you can't have it both ways, even if it would be like a dream
< You used the anthrax example.>
"you"?? Ames??
<Think how many can be killed by just a tiny bit of anthrax, and think about how it's not just that
Saddam Hussein might put it on a Scud missile, an anthrax head, and send it on to some city
he wants to destroy.>
Yes, or just in the mail like a regular dude.
<Think about all the other terrorists and other bad actors>
Reagan was a semi-good actor, but he too got into bad companion, although he did not shake
hands with Saddam on photographs, he left it to others.
<who could just parade through Baghdad and pick up their stores>
Exactly, lots of bad actors who would like to parade through Baghdad, although that is
not exactly where the oilfields are.
< if we don't take action.>
Yes, 400 billion barrels out of 1,000 worldwide billion barrels is something to take action for, especially
when considering how the cost increases, especially after the stage the USA barrels are, close
to cost $40-60/barrel... ouch, tough to suck out those last drops.
< I far prefer the United Nations, I far prefer the inspectors,>
pefer in terms of what, and until what??
< I have been far from trigger-happy on this thing,>
Yes, my dad told me it takes 0.5-0.75 year to move military stuff around and this time there
was no Glasspie around
< but if they>
Who they??
<really believe that there are no circumstances under which we would act alone, they are sadly mistaken.>
As well as who-we?? mistaken about what??
<That is not a threat.>
So what is the use of mentioning it>>
< I have shown I do not relish this thing.>
What thing??
< Every time it's discussed around here,>
And now that "it", is "it" or isn't "it" "it", or them, we or you??
<I say>
Finally, this time everyone knows who says
<one of the great luxuries of being the world's only superpower for a while>
Ouch, the hubbart point for the next difficult time to suck domestic oil is closer and closer??
Or, "who is", actually???
< -- and it won't last forever probably, but for a while>
True, major crises as all those hearings on energy costs have shown.
< -- is that there is always time enough to kill.>
Killing time seem to be fairly inefficient whn there so much else to kill.
< And therefore we have a moral responsibility to show restraint and to seek partnerships and
alliances, and I've done that.>
Great ending, clearly defined who did it, but responsibility for what?? and how, and what then??
< But I don't have to explain to my grandchildren why we took a powder on what we think is a very serious biologica and chemical weapons programs potentially by a country that has already used chemical weapons on the Iranians and on the Kurds, their own people. >
Great powder joke, don't sneeze too much, watch out for that pretzel..
I think Hammond is funnier
ucomics.com |
