SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (164309)3/15/2003 1:15:34 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574214
 
I might accept something like "this was the decision of a great legal mind so you should pay attention to it". But I don't accept it as automatic truth or something that would cause me to throw aside all the problems with the decision. ?

Look no one is telling you to accept it.......I was explaining to someone [I can't even remember who] that Roe vs Wade came out of a right to privacy issue. I provided Blackmun's opinion as evidence of that supposition.

However, that's lost in this whole argument because the right is so damn angry and determined to make the Supreme Ct.wrong on this issue.

ted



To: TimF who wrote (164309)3/15/2003 1:25:33 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574214
 
You know how you were telling me that the tax cuts will be great for the working class, and that the GOP is the friend of the working man. Someone needs to tell Warren Buffett.......he ain't getting it.

Also wasn't you or was it cranky D. Ray who was telling us the rich paid more than their fair share. Do you guys ever tell it how it really is?


_________________________________________________________

Business & Technology: Friday, March 14, 2003

Unfair to end dividend tax, billionaire says

By Bloomberg News




WASHINGTON — Warren Buffett told Senate Democrats yesterday that President George W. Bush's proposal to eliminate taxes on dividends would unfairly benefit the rich, senators said after meeting with the billionaire investor.

Getting rid of the dividend tax, the centerpiece of Bush's $726 billion tax-cut proposal, would slice the Berkshire Hathaway chairman's annual federal tax bill by $300 million, and Buffet said that would mean he would pay proportionately less in taxes than his secretary, according to lawmakers at the meeting.

Buffett, 71, spoke yesterday at a regular lunch held by the Democratic Policy Committee. Known to investors as "The Oracle of Omaha," after his hometown in Nebraska, Buffett didn't make any public comments, and the luncheon was closed to the media.

Buffett told senators he currently pays taxes at the same rate as his office secretary. He said if Congress passed Bush's dividend tax cut, his tax rate would be a small fraction of hers, senators said. Sen. Jon Corzine of New Jersey quoted Buffett as saying, "We may be having class warfare, but my class won."

"He thinks the most important thing for business is to be fair to working people, people in the middle class," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat. "The last thing we need is a tax cut for the wealthy."


Bush faces growing reluctance in Congress to pass a tax cut of the size he is proposing as the U.S. prepares for a war in Iraq and forecasts show the federal budget deficit ballooning. Opposition, which includes most Democrats and some Senate Republicans, is focused on the dividend-tax repeal.

Forty-nine percent of the benefits of eliminating the dividend tax would go to those with incomes in the top 1 percent of U.S. taxpayers, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, an independent research group that advocates for fairness in tax policy.

Average dividend-tax cuts would be $11,500 for the top 1 percent of taxpayers — people earning more than $374,000. The remaining 99 percent of taxpayers would receive average benefits of $1,232 to $1.

With a net worth of $30.5 billion, Buffett is the second-wealthiest man in the world after Bill Gates, according to Forbes magazine.

Copyright © 2003 The Seattle Times Company