Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (9447)	3/15/2003 3:14:24 AM
From: B Tate	Respond to of 10293

For your Penance: Buy ten shares of REFR (Get Certs!) buy a good $50 bottle of scotch Place shares on table along with ice and bottle Drink bottle Wipe up mess with shares and throw out. You've just added a second or two to "Days to cover" And you 've got a nice buzz. Seems about even to me LOL

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (9447)	3/15/2003 4:17:51 AM
From: get shorty	Respond to of 10293

Now that's a classic post. This bullet in particular was pure genius. 3) I can't cover a single share of REFR. There is no stock for sale. Whenever I call my broker he just shrugs and says, "sorry Mike/Manuel...none today".

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (9447)	3/15/2003 11:31:16 AM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Inspectech's I2 Shade: inspectech.net (lower half of the page) But wait a minute! Where's the light-to-dark feature? Where's the unlimited adjustability? Where's the blue? Where's the SPD?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (9447)	3/15/2003 2:18:03 PM
From: N. Dixon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

An open letter to Bill Wexler by: aarrcc 03/15/03 07:50 am Msg: 134863 of 134893 Dear Bill, Pardon me for repeating this post, but I really think you could clear up your credibility problem very easily. You have repeatedly made the claim that your name is Bill Wexler. This seems like an assertion that is easy to prove. Why won't you do it? You have also made the claim that you know the identity of the author of the asensioexposed.com web site. This seems like something that would be easy to prove. Why won't you do it? The obvious answer in both cases - and in many other cases - is: "Because you aren't telling the truth." Is there some other answer? Your one-alias pal, aarrcc