Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (21304)	3/15/2003 5:24:05 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

You too, little boy, ever watch C-SPAN?? No need to be honest, some things are obvious. Team 0-0-0 or 5-5-5??

To: AK2004 who wrote (21304)	3/15/2003 5:36:00 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

No. Any claim made by the bushies to support their attack is highly suspect though...forged "documents", out of date, plagiarized grad student papers with wording changed, false pronouncements of links with bin laden...there's a huge credibility problem in the bushie court.

To: AK2004 who wrote (21304)	3/15/2003 6:26:17 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25898

You asked Doug R, "Is Sadam a saint in your eyes now?", because he deliberately tried to protect Saddam, from the accusation that Saddam was paying suicide bomber's families. Doug said it was ALLEGED!? Even though Saddam's payments to terrorist families are well documented, and even celebrated, and bragged about, by the Palestinians. Why do you think someone like Doug R, wants to protect the Butcher of Baghdad's reputation? Is it just that Doug R wants to show off his lack of knowledge, or show off his confusion?