Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (21555)	3/16/2003 1:37:19 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Still, Brumar, Saddam could do much more, be much more effective with any R&D program were it backed with 300 billion dollars, instead of the 15 billion he's got now. I mean this is a clear fact! I think my previous post, ahed of this one, describes what's really going on. This is not a war against weapons of mass destruction. If it were one, Saddam would have complied long ago and afterwards built up such a program. Common sense tells us that. But common sense also tells us an easy war will be a winner for Bush, his insiders who'll make money from new deals (condemning the French on a deal over natural resources is utterly absurd given the USA's history of dealmaking); and Israel would get a boost by elminating the influence from the Iraqi threat.