Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (21710)	3/16/2003 7:22:41 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Do you find it at all ironic that when this war is over that it'll likely be the US which has killed more people than Saddam over Iraqi issues? Actually, I would find that astonishing... But if you're including those who are foolish enough to stand fast and fight to defend his regime, then you might be right... But I don't consider them much of a loss.. After all, an estimated 80,000 Iraqi soldiers died because Saddam was stupid enough to invade Kuwait.. So for us to kill more than that amount is going to take some real effort on our part. Personally, I think we'll see the largest majority of Iraq's army surrender at their first opportunity.. And I think we'll take great pains to ensure they have the opportunity to do so before attacking them them in force. Hawk