Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (164467)	3/16/2003 10:01:23 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574096

And every last former inspector said that? Hmmmm......assuming that comment is true, which it isn't; can we also assume they are telling the truth.......or, are they telling us that because they're pissed that the UN didn't renew their contracts? Perhaps you can name a couple (with links) who have said inspections will work without Saddam having made full disclosures pursuant to Resolution 687. And funny, its worked for 12 years and inspectors were not even in place for 4 of those 12. Excuse me? Where did you get the idea it "worked"? We still have 2 million lbs of chemical agent unaccounted for and tens of thousands of liters of bio agent. You call that working? Yet it will never work.. Right. You can't use inspection procedures designed to work if and only if you have a full disclosure, in circumstances where have no such disclosure. It'll be interesting to watch you try and argue your way out of all these remarks when the war is over. You'll be denying crap you've been saying for a year now. Can't wait.