Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (14767)	3/17/2003 4:12:32 AM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 89467

The truth hurts, don't it Scott? I stand by what I said Scott. You relentlessly post the most unsupportable crap of anyone on this thread. There is absolutely no excuse you can conjure up that will justify what you do. "Have you seen me attack ANYONE on this thread?" YES! The President & his Administration relentlessly!!!!!!!! I care more about your immoral & unethical attacks on the President & his Administration with some of the most vile & unsupportable lies, blatant distortions, slanderous allegations & fantasy land conspiracy theories than anything Scott. Bottom line.... I have used cold hard facts to refute so much of the left wing propaganda, etc., that you post. You have no factual evidence to support most of the obvious propaganda & left wing hate pieces that you post. Neither do the authors of that irresponsible drivel. "I'm a collaborator " Co-conspirator is more accurate Scott. <NG> "Notice that many of the things I post are often from major media outlets that are highly regarded (like The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune, The Boston Globe, Newsweek, The New Yorker, etc)..." LOL! Almost all of it is OP/ED slander from left wing writers who don't care about facts or reality Scott. And don't pretend that you don't use obvious slander from left wing rags & other disreputable outlets almost as frequently. What you don't post are articles, hard news pieces, from reputable news sources that are widely reported in other reputable news outlets. THAT'S A COLD, HARD FACT SCOTT!!!!!!! You are so delusional that you use revisionist history of your own actions Scott. Just like your other left wing peers. "I have serious concerns about country's leadership and this irrational 'rush to war'." 12 years of diplomacy is an irrational rush to war??????? Six months since resolution 1441, the 17th such resolution in 12 years is an irrational rush to war?????????? Give me a break! "you have made claims that I post 24/7 but that's not true " OK, 23 1/2hrs a day/6.75 days a week. Is that more accurate? <NG> Scott, if that is your best rebuttal, quit while you are being slaughtered. You post with the zeal of a genuine obsessive compulsive. Is that more accurate? BTW, your resume is impressive. Too bad you lack any morals & ethics here on SI with the vicious, slanderous attacks on the President & his Administration, particularly on this thread. That is an irrefutable fact Scott. "remember, just because I post something out here does not mean I agree with 100% of it " Sorry Scott, but you post the same version of the same basic lies, distortions, allegations & conspiracy theories relentlessly & your few personally written posts tell a essentially the exact same story. Perhaps you believe 90+% of the BS you post, but not much less. If you really didn't believe that crap was true, you would actually spend time explaining, in your own words what you don't agree with. Instead, your posting history agrees completely with my assessment of reality. Besides, this is the same line of BS you used in the past to explain why you relentlessly post the same one sided, extremist POV while you almost never posting anything contrary to that extremist POV. That speaks volumes about what you are really doing Scott. "I think we would all be better off if we got rid of the personal attacks and just shared, collaborated and debated whatever we are interested in" Scott, I have exposed the lies, distortions, baseless allegations & unsupportable conspiracy theories you relentlessly post & your own words are consistently in support of them. If you relentlessly post lies about the President & his Administration written by others & your own words support/repeat them, are you not a liar? If you post baseless allegations & unsupportable conspiracy theories about the President & his Administration & your own words mimic precisely the same thing, are you not being unethical & immoral? When you refuse to stop posting more of the same even though your sources & your own words have been exposed as untrue, slanderous, immoral & unethical, does that not indicate you are unethical & immoral? And consider that you have posted many hundreds, perhaps thousands of instances of this false, unsupportable crap. All I have done is be accurate about what you have done & what you continue to do. If you consider the truth & accurate descriptions to be a personal attack, that is your problem, not mine. Sorry Scott. You are what you post.

To: stockman_scott who wrote (14767)	3/17/2003 2:58:19 PM
From: Suma	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

Thanks to Scott,Karen,Partytime,Just-Observing and the others of you who have posted with such diligence the articles from newspapers around the world supporting what you believe. Your posts reflect the kind of intelligence I respect. All of you have refrained from name calling and generalizations with specifics in terms of your sources of information and your own personal convictions that this, more than imminent war, is immoral,wrong and unjustified. The refuters who constantly attack your posts, such as westera and others never have anything substantive to say other than name calling and their views are never posted with reference to where they glean their information. Sorry we had to lose the Effort to Stop the WAR. I have lived through four now. Maybe that is what a lot of you who have never experienced war will have to do to ever opposed a solution that is more beneficial to mankind. However, I digress. I just want to thank you all who supported the Don't Start the War thread and this one by Stockman Scott for your most enlightening posts. PEACE, NAMASTE Suma