Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : 2003 NCAA College Basketball March Madness -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Julius Wong who wrote (37)	3/18/2003 1:05:42 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 278

The west seems to be the toughest bracket by far. Arizona, Kansas, Duke, Illinois. I agree with Texas getting an easy ride. Pittsburgh would have been a better no 1. OTOH, so did Florida who could go far and meet Texas to go to the final 4. The mystery team to me was Xavier? A 3 seed and they lost their tournament to Temple. As for teams that didn't deserve to go...Alabama comes to mind first. No way I'd have given them a bid. Auburn wasn't bad but I'd probably given it to someone else. Boston college and Seton Hall didn't go and didn't deserve it. Texas Tech might have been good enough, beating Texas and losing in OT to Oklahoma but a 6-10 record in conference didn't help. I think UAB should have got a bid based on late season. Maybe in place of Cincinnati.