SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Thermo Tech Technologies (TTRIF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CAYMAN who wrote (6422)3/23/2003 8:32:44 AM
From: CAYMAN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6467
 
Fifty years of pride in Canada disappears

Michael Walker

National Post

Saturday, March 22, 2003

VANCOUVER - I wasn't born a Canadian. I was born in Newfoundland and became a Canadian at age four when as a result of a referendum Newfoundland left British colonial status behind to join the Canadian federation. For more than 50 years I have been a Canadian.

For more than 50 years I have been proud to be a Canadian. I was proud to be a Canadian when Canadian diplomats helped settle the Suez Crisis. I was proud to be a Canadian when collective action had to be taken the last time an expansionist megalomaniac decided to march down the Korean Peninsula. I was proud to be a Canadian when Canadian peacekeepers moderated Cyprus. I was proud on the infrequent occasions Canadian leaders took a tough stance during the Cold War. I was proud when Canadian troops played their role in the liberation of Kuwait, and more recently Afghanistan.

Today, I am embarrassed to be a Canadian. I am embarrassed to be represented by a Prime Minister who is so detached from reality and a sense of Canada's true interests. I am embarrassed by a political system which is impotent in the face of a Prime Minister descending into perfidy. I am embarrassed that the Prime Minister was accorded a standing ovation in Parliament by his party for having decided to let others take up Canada's cudgel in the war against terror.

I am embarrassed by the ignorance of history and the evil possibilities of human nature that are revealed in the fact that six out of 10 Canadians are against the United States taking action against Iraq without the United Nations' support in spite of the fact that a clear majority believed that the United Nations should have authorized the war. I am embarrassed that my countrymen evidently believe more in the preservation of the UN than they do in the values the UN was created to preserve.

I am embarrassed by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation which wears its antipathy for the war effort as a badge of honour.

I am embarrassed by Member of Parliament Carolyn Parrish who noted, "Damn Americans: Hate those bastards," and by the fact that while she was roundly criticized by even the left-wing Toronto Star, under our electoral system there isn't a "damn" thing we can do about her.

I am embarrassed that MP Parrish is a moderate by comparison with left-wing MP Bill Blaikie who accused President Bush of "planning every minute of his life to kill as many Iraqi children as he can in the name of oil or whatever it is that's really on the agenda." I am embarrassed that I live in a country where such a tiny, spite-encrusted intellect could be elected to the nation's Parliament.

I am embarrassed by the naiveté of the Canadian Liberal Parliamentarian, Colleen Beaumier, who visited Iraq and returned to tell Canadians, "President Hussein has spoken to his ministers and said some of these 'anti-freedom and anti-human rights' laws are harsh and they have to be revisited." What with such a nice man running Iraq, aren't those Americans beastly for what they are doing.

I am not embarrassed by the student demonstrators who use excessive language to press their case, for we expect them to be ignorant -- that is why we call them students. But what can explain their teachers encouraging them to do this?

Like a very large and growing number of Canadian families, some of our children now reside in the United States. They are there because of the mutual interest reflected in the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement and its provision for easy migration. I am embarrassed for them that their new neighbours might associate them with the Canada of Jean Chrétien.

I am embarrassed that my U.S.-born grandson, and hundreds of thousands of grandchildren of other Canadians, will one day say: "Why did Canada take Saddam Hussein's side in the war against terror," because as a child, not having the benefit of diplomatically crafted subordinate clauses, he will see clearly that in war, if you are not with them you are effectively against.

I am embarrassed that my many American friends and collaborators might, if even for an instant, associate me with the views expressed by my government and the Members of Parliament who have supported it in its present stance.

I am most of all embarrassed because we Canadians, who have so much to be grateful for from our longstanding collaboration with the United States, are turning our backs on our continental friends and partners in preference for the company of posers, scoundrels and genocidal lunatics.

nationalpost.com



To: CAYMAN who wrote (6422)6/14/2003 11:21:21 AM
From: CAYMAN  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 6467
 
BCSC welcomes Ottawa's latest crackdown on crime

B.C. Securities Commission *BCSC

Thursday June 12 2003 Street Wire

by Brent Mudry

In a sign that Ottawa is finally taking stock market crime seriously, Canada's justice minister introduced proposed new laws to tackle capital markets fraud in Parliament on Thursday, including increased maximum sentences, investigatory production orders, corporate whistleblower protection and a broadening of insider trading legislation.

Perhaps more importantly, the federal government also unveiled details of plans for up to nine Integrated Market Enforcement Teams, or IMETs, made up of RCMP investigators, lawyers and accountants dedicated to capital markets fraud cases.

"We do welcome the development," states Michael Bernard, spokesman for the British Columbia Securities Commission, the former home of the failed B.C. Securities Fraud Office. "We all look forward to more dramatic and swift action against those who violate securities laws, he added."

Previous much-vaunted efforts, ranging from B.C.'s Securities Fraud Office, a joint BCSC-RCMP operation that opened with much fanfare and was quietly shut down a few years ago, to the Canadian Market Integrity Scheme, launched with similar fanfare in 1966, but achieved little success in significant convictions, sentences or in dispelling Canada's image as a haven for unprosecuted white-collar market crime.

Not surprisingly, a veteran market prosecutor remains pessimistic about the chances for more convictions or meaningful sentences until Canada's judges treat white collar crime as seriously as street crime, violent offences and other largely blue collar crime. "When was the last time anyone was condemned to 10 years in jail for any market crime?" asks the prosecutor, who requested anonymity. "Why bother raising the maximum sentences when the current maximums are never reached?"

RCMP Chief Superintendent Peter German, the Director-General of the force's Commercial Crime Section, remains confident any naysayers will be proven wrong. "This legislative package and new sentencing ranges shows (the judiciary) that Parliament wants these offences treated more seriously," Mr. German told Stockwatch. The senior officer concedes there has been much disappointment in the past, but suggests the new efforts will go far to "changing that attitude."

The federal government announced Thursday the creation of six to nine IMET market prosecution teams, phased in over three years, with a total five-year budget of up to $120-million. These teams are based on the model of the RCMP's existing Integrated Proceeds of Crime, or IPOC, units, which handle money laundering and other crime proceeds.

Although Ottawa often announces programs by shuffling existing dollars around, Mr. German stresses that "this is all new money."

In year one, two teams will be launched in Toronto and one in Vancouver, all targeted by March 31, 2004. Mr. German is optimistic these first three teams will actually be in place by this fall. He confirms that Inspector John Sliter has been selected to co-ordinate the national program in Ottawa, while Inspector Craig Hanniford will be the implementation manager in Toronto, with other postings, including the Vancouver head, to be announced, at least internally, in the next couple of weeks.

In year two, three more teams will be launched: one each in Calgary and Montreal, and a third in Toronto. After that, an evaluation will be made before launching a final three times in year three: a second team in each of Vancouver, Calgary and Montreal. The phased-in program will be "fully funded" by the fourth year.

Each team will consist of about 11 members, including five or six investigators, investigative assistants to handle the grunt work, a lawyer, a forensic accountant and technical support staff including major case management.

Further police officers may be added through secondments, and dedicated prosecutors will be assigned from the overall budget.

A major focus will be speed -- as Canadian commercial crime probes are notorious for being bogged down for years. Mr. German notes he also hopes to significantly speed up the process for Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty, or MLAT, requests, which are basically investigative assistance requests sent to other countries, including secretive offshore havens, which often figure prominently in complex white collar cases. The senior officer notes he has seen some MLAT requests take years, while the odd one is done in virtually a day.

Mr. German notes the new teams will be "very targeted and very strategic," selecting cases with a substantial impact on the market and investor confidence. While penny stock cases may not generally qualify, if they are big enough, like Bre-X, they will. "The real emphasis is to protect Corporate Canada," from a loss in investor confidence, says the senior officer.

In outlining the new legislation in Parliament, the Justice Minister highlighted two proposed amendments to the Criminal Code of Canada. The first relates to "improper insider trading," targeting employees of companies, and others, who benefit from inside information. The second, a whistleblower protection, attempts to shield employees who tattle on their bosses.

The new provisions include amendments to enhance evidence-gathering tools, adding production orders to the Criminal Code. While such production orders would allow invesigators to get documents or data from innocent third parties, such as brokerages, banks and other financial institutions, they will likely be as wide open for attack by defence lawyers as existing search warrants and wiretap authorizations.

Before police can get a "general production order," they must prove to a judge or a justice of the peace that there are reasonable grounds to believe an offence has been committed, that the specific documents or data sought will produce relevant evidence, and that the recipient of the order has the possession or control of this information.
Of course, Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the legacy of Pierre Trudeau, can be used to argue against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. In addition, those who receive production orders can also object, by making an application to the court, to producing information on numerous grounds, including if the information is privileged or protected from disclosure, or because it is not in their possession or control.

On the sentencing end, the maximum sentences for current Criminal Code offences of fraud and fraud affecting the market will be raised from 10 years to 14 years. Maximum sentences for stock manipulation, which Ottawa apparently feels is less important, and is virtually impossible to convict on, will be doubled from five to 10 years.

"In addition, I have introduced specific sentencing factors that the courts will be required to take into consideration, so that the most serious offenders are treated more severely. Aggravating factors, such as the extent of economic damage or amount of profits unlawfully obtained, could warrant a more severe penalty," states Minister Cauchon.

"Furthermore, a person's reputation and status in the community or workplace -- which are traditionally used as mitigating factors to lower penalties -- will now be inapplicable in these cases, when those who commit serious capital markets fraud rely on these very factors to carry out their crimes."

bmudry@stockwatch.com

stockwatch.com