Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: eims2000 who wrote (22361)	3/17/2003 4:55:19 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Again, check the link that describes the UN functions. There is a provision that is similar, if not, what I described.

To: eims2000 who wrote (22361)	3/17/2003 5:09:28 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 25898

PartyTime: "What I think could happen, however, is that the General Assembly could order a peacekeeping interventionary force as a buffer between the US-Brit forces and Saddam's force." EIMS: You are insane. Message 18708596 Apparently, in answer to your original question, there is some kind of a provision. Unfortunately, I don't have time to go searching for it. Should you decide to find this operative language within the UN Charter, plesae let me know what you discover. In answer to your question "am I insance?" No. But most of the world could reasonably argue that perhaps George Bush is "insance" for wanting this war so badly and lying in order to get it.