Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (83359)	3/18/2003 1:14:38 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Condor is a "he," not a "she," though since "he" comes supplied with a terrific sense of humor, "he" will appreciate whatever evidence leads you to think "she." Whether JC loses respect for Condor is not the issue, Mike. It's the public posting of ad hominem attacks. If he wishes to post a PM to you about Condor, he should do so. If he wishes to argue that the parallels don't work, he should so so. The use of offensive moral metaphors from the past has been an earmark of some of the discussions on this thread: everything is Hitler, Chamberlain, Stalin, you name it. So long as those were used as metaphors without folk attacking the morals of people who use them, seems to me that's an argument. And we've done a great deal of that. So Condor's use of that fits within a well established thread tradition.