Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (164751)	3/18/2003 2:45:12 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573099

Ted, <As for relocating, must I remind you once again that one can disagree with an American president and still remain a citizen.> There's a big difference between disagreeing with a president and boldly proclaiming that he is not your president. The former is fine and should be encourage in a free society. The latter is rebellion. Tenchusatsu

To: tejek who wrote (164751)	3/18/2003 5:20:51 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573099

Ted Re...I love my country but I hate the current president. So now you are claiming that your hatred of GW allows you to go against the principles of your country. I say, if you loved your country half as much as you say, you would put your country above your hatred, period. As for relocating, must I remind you once again that one can disagree with an American president and still remain a citizen. Once again, your hatred has raised your blood pressure so high, you can't read anymore. I said, "Gw is the lawfully elected president, until he is dead, impeached, or served out his term, for every citizen in this country, not just the ones who voted for him. That would include you, unless you have decided to relocate to France maybe." That means that Gw is your president, unless you have already moved, or have decided to move. No where did I suggest you should move. If he was doing the right thing, he wouldn't need defending. I was defending the office of the president against someone who is preaching potentially,sedition and rebellion, not defending GW. If David had said the same thing about Bill, I would have told him the same thing.