The clinical goods on Cancidas, approved for refractory IA:
cancidas.com
Here's a head to head in vitro study:
>>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003 Feb;45(2):131-5 Related
In vitro activity of voriconazole, itraconazole, caspofungin, anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) and amphotericin B against aspergillus spp.
del Carmen Serrano M, Valverde-Conde A, Chavez M M, Bernal S, Claro RM, Peman J, Ramirez M, Martin-Mazuelos E.
Servicio de Microbiologia Clinica, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Valencia, Spain
Voriconazole, anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) and caspofungin are promising antifungal agents which provide a good protection against a variety of fungi, including yeasts and filamentous fungi. In this study, we tested the in vitro efficacy of voriconazole, itraconazole, caspofungin, anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) and amphotericin B, against different species of Aspergillus spp. isolated from clinical specimens, using a microdilution broth method and following the NCCLS guidelines (document M38-P). We also evaluated the effect that time readings have on MIC results. For caspofungin, we determined the minimun effective concentration (MEC), defined like the lowest concentration of caspofungin causing abnormal hyphal growth. Anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) was the most active antifungal agent tested with MIC(90) of </=0,03 mg/L. The activity of voriconazole, and itraconazole very similar with MIC(90) of 0,12 mg/L, 0,12 mg/L respectively. For caspofungin the MEC(90) was of 0,25 mg/L. Amphotericin B was the lest active antifungal agent studied with MIC(90) of 1 mg/L. There were no differences between MIC values at 48 and 72 h. These data demonstrate promising activity of voriconazole, anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) and caspofungin against Apergillus spp.<<
Also worth keeping an eye on Fujisawa's micafungin, the other echinocandin in late stage development:
>>Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002 Dec;46(12):3846-53
In Vitro Activity of Micafungin (FK-463) against Candida spp.: Microdilution, Time-Kill, and Postantifungal-Effect Studies.
Ernst EJ, Roling EE, Petzold CR, Keele DJ, Klepser ME.
College of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242. College of Pharmacy, Ferris State University, Big Rapids, Michigan 49307. Borgess Medical Center Department of Pharmacy, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001.
We evaluated the in vitro activity of the new echinocandin antifungal micafungin against Candida spp. using microdilution and time-kill methods. Additionally, we examined the postantifungal effect (PAFE) of micafungin. Finally, we evaluated the effect of the addition of serum and plasma on the MIC of micafungin. Four Candida albicans isolates and two isolates of each Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, and Candida tropicalis were selected for testing. The MICs of micafungin were determined in RPMI 1640 medium buffered with morpholinepropanesulfonic acid alone and with the addition of 10, 20, and 50% human serum and plasma. MICs were determined by using two endpoints: a prominent reduction in growth (the MIC at which 80% of isolates are inhibited [MIC(80)]) and complete visual inhibition of growth (MIC(100)). The minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of micafungin for each isolate was also determined. Time-kill curves were determined for each isolate in RPMI 1640 medium with micafungin at concentrations ranging from 0.125 to 16 times the MIC(80) to assess the correlation between MIC(80) and fungicidal activity. PAFE studies were conducted with each isolate by using concentrations ranging between 0.25 and 4 times the MIC(80). The MIC(80)s for the test isolates ranged from 0.0039 to 0.25 micro g/ml. Overall, the addition of serum or plasma increased the MIC 6 to 7 doubling dilutions for C. albicans and 3 to 4 doubling dilutions for C. krusei and C. tropicalis. Micafungin time-kill studies demonstrated fungicidal activity at concentrations ranging from 4 to 16 times the MIC(80). Micafungin is very potent agent against a variety of Candida spp., producing fungicidal activity against 7 of 10 isolates tested. A PAFE was observed against all isolates. The PAFE was influenced by the drug concentration, with the highest concentration resulting in the longest observed PAFE in each case. The highest concentration tested, four times the MIC, resulted in a PAFE of more than 9.8 h for 5 of 10 isolates tested (range, 0.9 to >/=20.1 h).<<
Cheers, Tuck |
