Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PCSS who wrote (2721)	3/19/2003 11:23:31 AM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4345

story.news.yahoo.com IBM Storage Makes Gains Vs. HP, EMC Tue Mar 18,10:18 AM ET By Brian Deagon IBM Corp. (NYSE:IBM - News) gained the most ground of any data storage vendor in the fourth quarter, enough to tie with Hewlett-Packard Co. for the lead in market share. So says a report this month from market tracker International Data Corp. It gave both companies 25% of the revenue from total fourth-quarter sales of data storage systems, which include everything from high-end networked storage gear to disk drives that back up server systems. IBM gained four percentage points in the fourth quarter vs. the third, while HP fell two percentage points. HP led slightly in total revenue, $1.37 billion to $1.34 billion, but HP sales rose just 6% vs. 34% for IBM. EMC Corp. ranks No. 3, with quarterly sales of $614 million. Big Blue executives loved the showing. They credited the gains to IBM's strategy of being a one-stop shop for all sorts of computer products and services. That same desire to be a one-stop shop prodded HP's $19 billion purchase last year of Compaq Computer, but the companies are still ironing out that merger, the computer industry's largest ever. IBM, on the other hand, set its strategy in motion a decade ago when it decided that offering services would be essential to its success. "Our storage product portfolio has never been better in our history," said Bob Samson, vice president of sales for the IBM Systems Group. "But the No. 1 reason for our success is our ability to integrate these components with solutions and services." In a separate report this month, Merrill Lynch & Co. writes that IBM executives say the company could double the size of its storage business through one-stop bundling, such as selling servers and storage in a package deal. IDC analyst Charlotte Rancourt agreed with Samson. "Their products are doing very well," she said. "And when IBM merged its storage business into its server division, they did so with the intent of emphasizing the capabilities of fully integrated solutions. That's very appealing to a lot of customers." IBM's market gains come at a tough time for the data storage industry. Full-year 2002 sales fell 15% vs. 2001, says IDC. On the other hand, IDC had expected a 21% decline. And fourth-quarter revenue rose 12% from the year-ago period. Meanwhile, IBM and HP have jockeyed for the lead. HP took the lead from IBM in the second quarter of 2002. Leadership in this sector has been IBM's quest since it lost the top spot to EMC in the late 1990s. "It's a gritty comeback for us that started four years ago," Samson said. The fourth quarter was the first time IBM's line of high-end storage systems, known as Shark, outsold EMC's line of similar products, called Symmetrix. Still, IBM is hardly out of the woods in the high end. Last month EMC unveiled the long-awaited update to its line of Symmetrix high-end storage products. And No. 4 player Hitachi Ltd. is expected to refresh its high-end line in early 2004.

To: PCSS who wrote (2721)	3/19/2003 1:22:47 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4345

theinquirer.net HP attacks Big Blue Power 5 servers, Sun reliability Competitive engine cranks up By Eva Glass: Wednesday 19 March 2003, 15:30 SOURCES SAID that HP is making a concerted attack against its competitors IBM and Sun in a bid to position Itanium as a big tin killer. HP told its customers that Power 5 servers from IBM and set for release early next year were unlikely to quadruple the performance of the p690, and claimed that Big Blue is scared by HP systems running the Itanium. The Power 5 technology is way down the line, uses unproven technology, and has no commercial performance figures yet available. Further, HP claims that customers will have to physically swap out boxes when Power 5 is launched, and that migrating in a similar way from HP systems will be $1 million cheaper than the move from the p690 to the IBM Armada. Plus HP is spreading rumours that IBM is far from committed to the AIX operating system. HP's FUD engine is also attempting to roll off the firm it truly loves to hate, Sun Microsystems. It is telling its customers there's a design problem in the 900MHz UltraSparc III uniboards that can cause crashes when the level two cache is hit sometimes. Gartner, HP's friends, apparently have more info about this and while Sun has a fix to the problems it will only act after it hears from Sun customers, the FUD machine rumbles. You wouldn't know it from the outside, but HP, Sun, IBM and the rest all have big competitive teams whose function is to diss the opposition – but never publicly, naturally. µ