Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (69020)	3/19/2003 4:22:41 PM
From: bcrafty	Respond to of 209892

Thanks Allan, I also thought the discussion was getting wiggly, but I wasn't around for much of today and I thought maybe I had missed something in the current discussion. Maybe if you have time tonight could you post a chart with a putative projection for the "iv" and "v" of C (level wise and/or time wise)? BTW, you're not selling your longs only to rebuy them at the bottom of the "iv" are you?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (69020)	3/19/2003 4:25:16 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Who says there is no PPT? "US and Japan to protect markets: Just days ahead of a war, the US and Japan are prepared to co-operate to support the financial markets if there is a crisis news.bbc.co.uk Looks to me like this news is a week late! NG

To: AllansAlias who wrote (69020)	3/19/2003 4:47:18 PM
From: Perspective	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

I had the same question. Wave A was 36 days; we are now done with 24 days in NDX and 27 days in SOX, so the time is becoming comparable there. If C=0.618*A, we just need to retest the December highs on those two. However, non-tech made that minor new low last week before launching. Do you think that we may have a big "C" on deck in tech, accompanied by something completely different in non-tech? You recall that we had conflicting tech/non-tech counts into the October lows - looking like tech had completed something big and was therefore correcting a larger part of the bear. That would argue for a longer corrective mode in tech. Non-tech actually looked like it might be in a lower degree correction, which would allow for it to be done, pointed down, and this might just be a correction of the down off the December highs. We are now at the 62% retrace of that move in SPX. What do you think? Two totally different counts at work here tech vs. non-tech? If these two counts are in play, we would be very near the top. BC