Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Saturn V who wrote (173672)	3/19/2003 5:13:40 PM
From: hueyone	Respond to of 186894

Those are all great points. In a general sense, however, I think preemptive action may be warranted more often in this modern world than it has been in the past. In this particular case, however, I agree with you that Bush has not made a clear case that preemptive action is necessary, nor has he made his plans clear for the aftermath. Had I been given a chance to vote on whether to go to war, I would have voted "no" given the limited information I am privy to. Now the decision is made, however, I am willing to give Bush the benefit of the doubt and "hope" he knows what he is doing and where is going. Regards, Huey