Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (164941)	3/19/2003 5:32:09 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1573364

Has? Did you mean to say that the current diplomatic fiasco is Clinton's fault? No. I mean that the current crisis with Iraq is Clinton's fault. He should have dealt with it in 1998 when Iraq violated the terms of the ceasefire. When you are perceived by the Mideast to be weak, you are asking for it. Had Clinton acted swiftly and decisively, with a massive military buildup in the Gulf, and following through with war if necessary, a lot of "stuff" that has happened since may have been headed off. I'll leave it at that. Absolute incompetence. The right spent 8 years not only wishing it failure, the right took concrete action in that regard. Not true. The "Right" was far more cooperative with Clinton than the Left has been with Bush. One need only look so far as the Judiciary Committee for clear proof of this fact. The current adminisration has been run in absolutely brilliant fashion. The things you think are "fiascos" are, to the right, proper handling of diplomatic issues. Your idea of diplomacy is the kind of despicable behavior of Jimmy Carter.