SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mannie who wrote (15042)3/19/2003 7:31:13 PM
From: lurqer  Respond to of 89467
 
I figured it would fly through with the given political atmosphere

A 48-52 vote is still too close. 'Course you noticed when the vote was taken. The Oil & Gas Boyz are really ticked off.

lurqer



To: Mannie who wrote (15042)3/19/2003 7:31:47 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Condor makes some interesting comments...

Message 18724056

Scott, Do many of your friends from the last Gulf War think this 'pre-emptive strike' on Iraq is a wise move...?

regards,

-s2

btw, I am proud of our Senate for stopping the rush to drill for oil in ANWAR...Yet, we still need a more credible and responsible energy policy.



To: Mannie who wrote (15042)3/19/2003 7:34:41 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Sen. Robert Byrd: 'Today I Weep for My Country'

1 hour, 7 minutes ago
3/19/03
By Thomas Ferraro

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The oldest voice in the U.S. Congress rose on Wednesday to denounce as misguided President Bush's march to war with Iraq.



"Today I weep for my country," said West Virginia Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd. "No more is the image of America one of strong, yet benevolent peacekeeper. ... Around the globe, our friends mistrust us, our word is disputed, our intentions are questioned.

"We flaunt our superpower status with arrogance," Byrd said, adding: "After war has ended the United States will have to rebuild much more than the country of Iraq. We will have to rebuild America's image around the globe."

Byrd, who has been a leading foe on Capitol Hill of war with Iraq, spoke in a nearly empty Senate chamber about four hours before Bush's 8 p.m. EST deadline for Saddam Hussein to leave Iraq or face a U.S.-led invasion.

"May God continue to bless the United States of America in the troubled days ahead, and may we somehow recapture the vision which for the present eludes us," Byrd said.

As the white-haired senator concluded his remarks, a number of people in the visitor's gallery rose and applauded before they were admonished to be quiet.

At 85, Byrd is now the oldest member of Congress as well as the longest serving. He was first elected to the Senate in 1958, after six years in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Byrd was among those who voted last year against the congressional resolution that authorized Bush to use force in his showdown with Saddam, and the senator has given frequent floor speeches since then warning against war.

Polls on Wednesday showed strong American support for a war but widespread opposition to it overseas.

"The case this administration tries to make to justify its fixation with war is tainted by charges of falsified documents and circumstantial evidence," Byrd said.

Despite administration suggestions to the contrary, Byrd said, "There is no credible information to connect Saddam Hussein to 9/11."

The senator said, "We cannot convince the world of the necessity of this war for one simple reason. This is a war of choice."

Byrd said that instead of negotiating, Washington demanded obedience or threatened recrimination. "Instead of isolating Saddam Hussein, we seem to have isolated ourselves."

He said many questions about the looming war were unanswered -- including how long it would last, what it would cost, what its ultimate mission was.

"A pall has fallen over the Senate chamber," Byrd said. "We avoid our solemn duty to debate the one topic on the minds of all Americans, even while scores of thousands of our sons and daughters faithfully do their duty in Iraq."

story.news.yahoo.com



To: Mannie who wrote (15042)3/19/2003 10:30:07 PM
From: portage  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
Why is it startling ? They figure they already own the Iraqi oil, why bother with the North Slope ?



To: Mannie who wrote (15042)3/19/2003 11:21:12 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Scott..yes amazing....
at least for a while the ANWR is off limits...
and we can burn Iraqi oil..
T