Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SecularBull who wrote (374685)	3/19/2003 9:06:55 PM
From: Kevin Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I think that stabilization would be in everyone's interest. Given that, would you be in favor of something that would certainly stabilize the entire region: Transport all Israelis to New Mexico or some appropriate new land. Today's Israel would become Palestine. Of course not, you're probably saying. So, some change, even if it attains the desired goal, is bad. I think Saddam must go, and should have gone in '91. The son is atoning for the father's unfinished work. However, the path and methods to the solution are sometimes as important as the actual solution. Our diplomatic efforts have made us seem both arrogant and weak, in the eyes of many. The long term effect of our resulting unilaterism will have a damaging effect for many years to come. To those who say "screw the rest of the world", I say: you need to wake up and realize that we live in a global community now. Technology has brought both advantages and disadvantages. The people of the world are much more in tune with global events. We can no longer control what people see and hear. Diplomacy is even more important than in the past, and we now have a lot of catching up to do.