Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (154471)	3/20/2003 9:49:40 AM
From: GST	Respond to of 164684

I am sorry if you think it presumptuous of me to assume we are at war. Please inform the rest of the world -- most people share my "presumption".

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (154471)	4/2/2003 2:55:37 AM
From: craig crawford	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

>> Your use of the term 'war' is quite presumptuous. It assumes two sides battling each other. We may not see much of that at all. But you in your wisdom assume we will. Because you are presumptuous. << well i believe both you and buschman predicted that bush had some brilliant strategy to disarm saddam by threatening war and in the end saddam was going to roll over and bush was going to come out victorious by getting saddam to disarm without a shot being fired. something to that effect. well you were both wrong. as i and some others told you for months, war was always the goal and was going to be the result, it was never just about bullying saddam into disarmament.