SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PartyTime who wrote (433)3/20/2003 2:07:13 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21614
 
Former CBS anchor Cronkite voices disappointment in move to war

Retired journalist addresses Drew about future of U.S.
By Rob Jennings
from the Daily Record newsroom
03/19/03 - Posted 12:19:32 AM

MADISON - The "most trusted man in America," retired CBS Evening News anchor Walter Cronkite, put aside his journalistic impartiality Tuesday night and issued a blistering dissent to President Bush's decision to wage war with Iraq.

At a Drew University forum, Cronkite said he feared the war would not go smoothly, ripped the "arrogance" of Bush and his administration and wondered whether the new U.S. doctrine of "pre-emptive war" might lead to unintended, dire consequences.

"Every little country in the world that has a border conflict with another little country … they now have a great example from the United States," Cronkite, 86, said in response to a question from Drew's president, former Gov. Thomas Kean.

More than 2,000 people attended the 8 p.m. forum, including college students such as Jennifer Gross, 19, of Sparta, who wasn't yet born when Cronkite surrendered his groundbreaking anchor post in 1981.

Also attending was 83-year-old Debbie Langehammer of Morristown, who recalled Cronkite's most famous broadcasting moment - the tragic afternoon when he blinked back tears while announcing the death of President Kennedy in 1963.

Hobbled by a torn Achilles tendon, Cronkite began by discussing one of his journalistic high points, reviewing the D-Day invasion with President Eisenhower in Normandy. He then addressed the looming war with Iraq.

"I'm very disappointed that we've come to this point," Cronkite said.

While many are confident the United States would easily oust Saddam Hussein, Cronkite said he isn't so sure. "The military is always more confident than circumstances show they should be," he said.

Cronkite speculated that the refusal of many traditional allies, such as France, to join the war effort signaled something deeper, and more ominous, than a mere foreign policy disagreement.

"The arrogance of our spokespeople, even the president himself, has been exceptional, and it seems to me they have taken great umbrage at that," Cronkite said. "We have told them what they must do. It is a pretty dark doctrine."

Cronkite chided Congress for not looking closely enough at the war and attempting to ascertain a viable estimate of its eventual cost, particularly in light of Bush's commitment to tax cuts.

"We are going to be in such a fix when this war is over, or before this war is over … our grandchildren's grandchildren are going to be paying for this war," Cronkite said.

"I look at our future as, I'm sorry, being very, very dark. Let's see our cards as we rise to meet the difficulties that lie ahead," he added, in a play on Bush's dismissive remarks about France.

But Cronkite, who spent many days and nights on battlefields and in campgrounds with U.S. forces, also spoke of supporting the troops.

"The time has come to put all of our, perhaps distaste, aside, and give our full support to the troops involved. That is the duty we owe our soldiers who had no role in deciding this course of action," Cronkite said.

In response to a question about media bias, Cronkite said the press is not politically partisan but does tilt toward liberalism. He said that the smartest president he ever met was Jimmy Carter.

"Most news people start their early years as cub reporters, covering the seamy side of life. They see the poverty. They see the want" - and as a result, Cronkite said, tend to favor the underprivileged.

dailyrecord.com



To: PartyTime who wrote (433)3/20/2003 2:26:27 AM
From: Volsi Mimir  Respond to of 21614
 
I've been opposed to dictators since the '60s
Then why put yourself through all of this misery? All I see is your defense of a Butcher, not an utopian foray of idealism (peace at all cost). I am not for war, I am for security, and when or if that comes to conflict then prepare for it and execute that action with the goal in mind that the only peace one will ever have is within the umbrella of security where even different opinions can be expressed without retribution (well except, maybe, with a few sarcastic comments).
There has not been any other peace without it. (security)



To: PartyTime who wrote (433)3/20/2003 11:19:20 AM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21614
 
Yes the US says that it will prosecute the Iraqi leaders as War Criminals yet is not prepared to recognise an international tribunal itself! - shades of the World Court and the mining of the harbour? And I guess the murder of Sadaam will save the US the embarrasment of his revelations once in the dock. But IMO if the US puts the remaining Iraqi Leadership on trial there will be no shortage of the world's top legal minds willing to defend them. Better murder the lot - sorry 'assisinate' them isn't this the cosher word?

This war is going to sicken people - easy to brag and swagger your way into war - far more difficult to justify the slaughter - for what? WMD, Regime Change, take your pick - but don't mention oil or Israel's agenda. Fortunately there are still some decent war correspondents in Bagdad - so we should get some proper reporting and be able to ignore the uniformed cheerleaders from the networks.