Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (173693)	3/20/2003 2:41:54 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Amy, <China Calls for Immediate Halt to War on Iraq> The same China that rolled tanks over student protesters in Tiennamen Square? I would not take China's statement as anything other than obstructionism from a potential competing superpower. Meanwhile, South Korea has expressed support for the war: cnn.com South Korea's newly inaugurated President Roh Moo-hyun Wednesday pledged his country's support for the U.S.-led military strike on Iraq, saying that Seoul was working to head off any adverse effect it might have on relations with North Korea. In a televised address shortly after the war in Iraq began, Roh said he believed the military action was taken "upon the failure of diplomatic efforts to resolve the Iraqi problem in a peaceful manner." Roh said Seoul would provide support on a humanitarian, economic, and medical level in post-war Iraq, as well as help strengthen the military. ... The Korea Times reported that Roh had pledged to dispatch up to 750 non-combat troops to Iraq. The U.S. State Department says South Korea is one of 30 member countries -- including the U.S. -- of what it has called the "Coalition for the Immediate Disarmament of Iraq." Tenchusatsu

To: Amy J who wrote (173693)	3/21/2003 1:09:56 AM
From: ehasfjord	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Hi Amy, If you read the print re: the UN charter, you'll find that it does not preclude one nation going to war with another without the sanction of the UN. My take on it is; the main reason that China is opposed to the war is that when it's over, chinese printing will be found on certain "objects" that were "not supposed to be" in Iraq. Same applies with the French. The Germans are trying to forget WWII, and the Russians are to poor to take any action at all. Regards.