Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (165014)	3/20/2003 9:32:23 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575174

He claims a un-named senior diplomat, trying to get countries on board, had told countries a decision was already made. However he forgets to tell us when, what decision, or any other pertinent details. Yet we are to believe his allegations. He claim Gw had decided to go to war months ago. Was that before, or after the UN debacle. Was that before GW tried to bluff Saddam out of his weapons or after. It is these lack of details which make this article just another "I hate GW " article disguised as a serious piece of thrash. There are documents which have been posted on this thread predating 9/11 showing that the people who really control this policy had decided long ago to attack Iraq. The president is but a front. You have to be asleep to not know that the UN sharade was little more than that. As Powell worked to get UN consensus, the hawks undermined his efforts. Al