Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (29644)	3/20/2003 3:49:54 PM
From: SOROS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

That would not work. My theory is, if Saddam does not use any WMD, then only one of two possible things can be true -- either he does not have them (and hence, we have been lied to), or he is not the threat he has been portrayed as (and we have been lied to). If you have them, and you are being attacked with death certain, you use them if you are even a little crazy. I certainly don't want to see something happen in the USA or to the troops, but without it, it sure makes the US machine look less than truthful and the oil/money theory more believable. I remain, SOROS ps I'd like to hear Slider's take on this. Might be hard to rationalize while wanting the general market to go up and gold to tank, however?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (29644)	3/20/2003 7:47:32 PM
From: RealMuLan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

>>One thing for certain: if they Iraqis have no weapons of mass destruction (silly term), our dirty tricks guys will plant some on them for the world to see.<< well said, Mike, I think so too. and it is not all that difficult<g>