SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RockyBalboa who wrote (9499)3/20/2003 11:34:51 AM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
Strange how the same person who denies, denies, denies that Bill could possibly have covered in the $7 range now claims he DID cover at a much higher price.

It's almost as if (s)he has gotten to the point where (s)he might be able to come to grips with the losses, if only (s)he can pretend that the other side lost even worse.



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (9499)3/20/2003 12:40:24 PM
From: N. Dixon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
Dixon, I expect you to produce some hard evidence that Wexler covered in the "high 30s" quite pronto, is that clear?

I'll produce it after Bill produces his evidence that Dr. Malvino is the author of asensioexposed.com

and that Roman Reyes of Razor's Edge is the same guy as Roman Reyes who filed bankruptcy in NM

and that REFR insiders used company funds on an escort service.

ND


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News