Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (9518)	3/21/2003 12:15:09 AM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Dixon in Wonderland 1) Dixon lays down a simple challenge: "Prove me wrong." Message 18729739 2) Wexler points out that in 1998 Dixon predicted $400 a share for REFR "within 5 years". The quote for REFR on 3/20/2003 is $5.84. Message 18729894 3) Instead of acknowledging her error, Dixon dismisses it. Amazingly, she claims that this is not proof that she is wrong! Reason: It's an old post. Message 18730246 Conclusion: Dixon implies that she can never be proven wrong, because - in Dixon's world view - her uninterrupted, multiple-year history of being consistently wrong about REFR's business and stock price can not be used as evidence against her simply because her claims were made in the past. I other words - she wants any false, fraudulent, or erroneous claim that she has made in the past to simply be ignored. Fascinating.

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (9518)	3/21/2003 12:51:16 AM
From: N. Dixon	Respond to of 10293

Well then it sure as hell ain't about message board posts, short selling, anonymous aliases, accusations of market manipulation and extortion, or any of the other of dozens of things you obsess upon. You're right. The company fundamentals have nothing to do with that but the current stock price does. ND