SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: T L Comiskey who wrote (15156)3/20/2003 10:04:42 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Pentagon has reports of Iraqi oil wells ablaze

Thursday, March 20, 2003 Posted: 7:46 PM EST (0046 GMT)

cnn.com


WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said Thursday that the Pentagon has received reports that Iraqi forces have set "as many as three or four" oil wells ablaze in southern Iraq, near the Kuwaiti border.

"We are attempting to get additional information on that," he said at a Pentagon briefing.

Pentagon officials told CNN the fires are at well heads and not in oil-filled trenches.

Plumes are visible in satellite images taken by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration which the agency describes as "consistent with NOAA's experience in detecting oil fires in the past from satellites in space."

"In addition, these plumes have been co-located as being consistent with where oil wells are known to exist," NOAA said in a press release.

The images were produced from data taken Thursday at 5:05 a.m. EST by the NOAA-16 satellite, a polar-orbiting satellite that floats about 520 miles above Earth in roughly a north-south orbit, NOAA said.

Saddam has set oil fires before
Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has ordered oil wells to be set ablaze in the past. After his forces invaded Kuwait in August 1990, and coalition forces were massing together to force them out, Saddam said if he had to be evicted from Kuwait by force, then Kuwait would be burned.

As promised, Iraqi troops set fire to more than 700 oil wells in several Kuwaiti oil fields in 1991 as they were retreating. Officials from the Kuwait Oil Company reported that all of Kuwait's oil fields had been damaged or destroyed by the Iraqis.

The United States helped Kuwait in an international nine-month effort to extinguish the blazes.

Before the fires, Iraq was responsible for intentionally releasing some 11 million barrels of oil into the Arabian Gulf from January to May 1991, oiling more than 800 miles of Kuwaiti and Saudi Arabian coastline. The amount of oil released was categorized as 20 times larger than the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska and twice as large as the previous world record oil spill. The cost of cleanup was estimated at more than $700 million.



To: T L Comiskey who wrote (15156)3/20/2003 10:15:08 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
<<...Marine Chopper Crash Kills 16 in Kuwait...>>

Tim: Its sad....Unfortunately we launched this 'pre-emptive war' in a sand storm.

Now we have soldiers and the press rolling across the desert of Iraq -- live on CNN....those going into Baghdad first may be in the greatest danger...we have put Saddam's back up against the wall and this is precisely the time that the CIA said he would be the most dangerous...If he fails to be wise enough to escape my hunch is he will fight to the end in Baghdad -- urban combat with the possibility of unleashing some chem or bio WMDs that would be tragic for our soldiers and for innocent Iraqis.

Was this military adventure over in Iraq really necessary?

Iraq would clearly be better off without Saddam as a leader BUT we should ask much tougher questions (and Congress should have A REAL DEBATE) before we get into 'the regime change' game.

My thoughts and prayers will be with our troops and their families...No worries about the chickenHawks in Washington...VERY FEW of the political folks in favor of this war ever spent much time on the battlefield -- that should tell you something.

regards,

-s2



To: T L Comiskey who wrote (15156)3/21/2003 8:14:21 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Some comments on 'Shock and Awe'...

Message 18734445