Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lifeisgood who wrote (29678)	3/20/2003 11:24:53 PM
From: SOROS	Respond to of 36161

After seeing Waco and Oklahoma (I'll not rehash the various conspiracies, but we all know what they were), and how the World Trade Center thing came off (no allegations, but once again, many unfathomable coincidences and slip-ups), I'd worry more about the actual use of them. Simply finding will not really be good enough, IMO. That would only prove the Iraqi leadership was not so barbaric as reported. I still feel that if no WMD are used, it makes the stories we have been told not very believable. I remain, SOROS

To: lifeisgood who wrote (29678)	3/21/2003 12:26:20 AM
From: Little Joe	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 36161

Of course we know Sadaam has no WMD, those kurds just died from a sudden attack of old age. And he managed to fire missles at US that he doesn't have and threatens to use chemical weapons that he doesn't have. Why are you so eager to disbelieve everything US says, but lap up all the lies from a proven liar, murderer and general bad guy? Little joe