SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: damniseedemons who wrote (154538)3/21/2003 7:16:25 AM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
Now it's official: most Americans are idiots.

Hey, he stole GST's line. And that's not the only one.

This guy got published? "Ted Rall is the author of "Gas War: The Truth Behind the American Occupation of Afghanistan" ... I bet he thinks the CIA planned 9/11. And that Elvis was abducted by aliens.



To: damniseedemons who wrote (154538)3/21/2003 8:31:07 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Ther are people on this thread who continue to assert that there is a solid al Qaeda--Iraqi axis... Pure hogwash, but you will find a lot of that sort of twisting and turning on this thread to justify US foreign policy.



To: damniseedemons who wrote (154538)3/21/2003 1:41:44 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 164684
 
I know the european byline was that Bush was after Iraqi oil. I never believed it... but now that I see absolutely *no* evidence of chemical weapons or WMDs and iraqis ambivalent about the entire exercise (they are not "giving up" in droves although they aren't exactly going down for their country either)... I believe now that the main motivation was indeed to break up OPEC. Not quite the same as the US *taking over* iraqi oilfields but the result as far as the US is concerned is basically the same. It also removes us from Saudi influence.

There is a Bill Kristol commentary on the web somewhere that says essentially this, I am trying to find it.

I am not in favor of this type of bullying, my view is we should spend huge dollars on one of the battery alternative fuel sources vs. waging any kind of war, anywhere for oil. I'm sure if we spent billions on alternative fuels, the same $$ that this war cost, we would prevail and solve the problem here at home.



To: damniseedemons who wrote (154538)3/21/2003 5:46:00 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Respond to of 164684
 
Salim, why didn't Clinton do anything about the 850,000 Rwandans who were massacared in Africa?

Don't you think some of that could have been prevented if Clinton Admin had acted? If the Clinton Admin had cared?