Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: N. Dixon who wrote (9536)	3/21/2003 2:56:08 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Well, uh... you need a few corrections there. When Wex has made a bad trade, he's admitted so. Quite in public, in fact. "Poor, defenseless, innocent Bill Wexler. He's never ... made a bad trade" Are you "the really mean old REFR shareholder lady from San Francisco"? I don't know, but I know you carry on this vendetta like a really young junior high-school chik, just like you're carrying it on with me right now for the simple act of me responding to Midland. "He's never told a lie" I don't know that, either. From my experience, no. What I do know is that a price of $400 per share (as you've exclaimed) cannot be supported in anyway by any realistic figure of even the most mushroom-addled of imaginations, for a company that's older than I am, that has never made a profit. Hey, I I I as a single individual, have made more money in my lifetime than Research Frontiers has, as a company. So maybe you oughta try Ecstasy or some other designer drug to make those earnings projections appear. Or just invest in me — shareholders would have had a better income statement. You say $400, Bill says $0. Who's closer to lying? Stock is five'n'change. That's a pretty big "Duh" for most people. -MrB (Yes, I'm a "Bill", too. Try not to get us confused between "Kevin"s and "Midland"s)

To: N. Dixon who wrote (9536)	3/21/2003 3:30:48 AM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Total posts on Silicon Investor by "N Dixon" between 3/15/2003 and 3/21/2003 = 64 Total posts on Silicon Investor by Bill Wexler between 3/15/2003 and 3/21/2003 = 22 Total posts on Silicon Investor by "N Dixon" between 3/15/2003 and 3/21/2003 involving the REFR stock fraud = 64 Total posts on Silicon Investor by Bill Wexler between 3/15/2003 and 3/21/2003 involving the REFR stock fraud = 19 Total profits earned by REFR in its 38 year history = 0 Total profits earned by the majority of investors in REFR stock in the 16 years its been public = 0 Total pre-tax profits earned by Bill Wexler shorting REFR to date = $441,000