SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Oracle Corporation (ORCL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: robert b furman who wrote (17992)3/21/2003 9:27:57 AM
From: MeDroogies  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19079
 
I agree about the large position amongst management. The downside to greed, however, is that they have more information and can "play" more.

This run up is pretty good, but I'm sure it's purely a war rally. ORCL's CC pronouncements will eventually play a role in getting this lower. Still, they didn't lower expectations, just said that estimates were going to be difficult to meet.

I don't see it going below 10. If so, ehas is right and you should back up the truck.



To: robert b furman who wrote (17992)3/22/2003 12:14:43 AM
From: ehasfjord  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19079
 
Still waiting for ORCL to drop some more (which it
shows signs of doing). It's coming off an M top pattern
and heading down.
The question is, (and I suppose if we knew the answer we
could buy LE's house) is how far down the last leg of
the M pattern will go. For the last few months, this
has been in the high 10's range. ORCL is not in an
oversold condition (as indicated by RSI), Stochastics
show a definite down movement, Moving Averages show the
same downward move, The last 3 candles indicate down
again on Monday, and the "koop-de-gracki" is that ORCL
has been going down while many of the other tech's have
risen. Hmmmmm

Forgot to mention, momentum is also heading south.
May nibble again around 10.50 to 10.75 depending upon
the planets signs, or continue to wait.

Take Care



To: robert b furman who wrote (17992)3/23/2003 12:20:33 AM
From: ehasfjord  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19079
 
OT
How do you send a "private" message?
TIA