Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (23566)	3/21/2003 10:12:18 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Because Saddam simply will not dry up and blow away..... He must be removed. And if you oppose removal in spite of ample evidence of torture, rape and abuse of Iraqis, ties to terror, failure to comply with 17 UN resolutions, etc....once can conclude quite logically that you support him...

To: zonder who wrote (23566)	3/21/2003 10:17:42 AM
From: Vitas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

>>>regardless of whether or not there is torture in Iraq, that is no grounds for the invasion of a country<<< wrong again zonder you are much too predictable Message 18732200

To: zonder who wrote (23566)	3/21/2003 1:27:43 PM
From: Machaon	Respond to of 25898

<< How is that supporting Saddam? All I said there is that regardless of whether or not there is torture in Iraq, that is no grounds for the invasion of a country. >> Torture, starvation, humiliation, weapons of mass destruction, waging war on his neighbors, funding terrorists, harboring terrorists, using chemical weapons on his own people ... You are clueless. To you, there is no justification for removing a ruthless, cruel dictator from power. You would have been right there with Neville Chamberlain, appeasing Hitler, and allowing Hitler to take over other countries without lifting a finger. Can you spell low-life?