Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth V. McNutt who wrote (376042)	3/21/2003 6:56:57 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 769667

Ken, re:Bush/Lieberman Definitely worth consideration. Steve

To: Kenneth V. McNutt who wrote (376042)	3/21/2003 7:02:09 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769667

Well if you really want someone who swore under oath that clinton did not lie under oath. I do wonder at what you concept of honesty is. That was a test of truth or lie under pressure. Under oath it's quite like mr. bill. In fact I see no difference at all. It's all about the meaning of is I guess. Lieberman is part of the rape of and character assassination of Miguel Estrada. Someone who can support the public lying about an American citizen has an identical moral equivalence to mr. bill.

To: Kenneth V. McNutt who wrote (376042)	3/21/2003 7:56:42 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

At a glance that looks ok, but Lieberman is beholden to the abortion industry, he lied and flip flopped so much during the last campaign that I don't think he could ever be dressed up enough to make the GOP happy.

To: Kenneth V. McNutt who wrote (376042)	3/24/2003 12:54:59 PM
From: Kenneth V. McNutt	Respond to of 769667

Annan has not hesitated to tackle other controversial issues. Opening the 1999 General Assembly, he spoke in favor of "humanitarian intervention," stating explicitly that national sovereignty could no longer shield governments that massively violate human rights of their citizens.Many developing countries, fearing that only weaker states would face such response, reacted negatively, but Annan has persisted in raising this issue, acknowledging the UN Charter's contradictions between sovereignty and human rights. In another controversial field, Annan increasingly spoke out about how economic sanctions against Iraq were causing the UN to be blamed for the humanitarian crisis facing the Iraqi population. I guess Goofy Annan forgot his statement during the 1999 opening of the United Nations. He had the guts to say today "that UNMOVIC is still responsible for disarming of Iraq". Unbelievable!! Ken