Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Enigma who wrote (1164)	3/22/2003 12:27:40 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

spaceimaging.com For future reference

To: Enigma who wrote (1164)	3/22/2003 12:32:32 PM
From: ChrisJP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

Wellllllllll parts of Central and South America look like bombed out cities too, lol. maybe some of the "destruction" was just the way Bagdad looked before the bombing. lol I guess when someone says a city is destroyed -- I think in terms of World War II destroyed -- totally destroyed. Anyway -- the bombing's not over, so I'm not gonna claim any position on this. And if we decide to storm Bagdad, wellllllll there will be some real destruction, not "ranting-raving-UK-Mirror's" definition of destruction. So all I'm doing is refuting the article. If Bagdad were destroyed -- Al-Jazeera would be showing people putting out fires day and night in residential areas. There would be THOUSANDS DEAD not 200 that I've heard mentioned. Like they will probably be showing by this time next week.