SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (4959)3/22/2003 8:11:27 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 8683
 
Allied Forces Advance Halfway to Baghdad
44 minutes ago

URL:http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=540&ncid=716&e=3&u=/ap/20030323/ap_on_re_mi_ea/war_battlefield

By ELLEN KNICKMEYER, Associated Press Writer

HIGHWAY 80 IN SOUTHERN IRAQ - Allied forces crossed the Euphrates River and were halfway to Baghdad on Saturday, their swift advance unimpeded by lingering resistance in the cities of Basra and Umm Qasr. The biggest hurdle: moving the massive military machine across the desert.

AP Photo

AFP
Slideshow: U.S. Military




Latest news:
· More Blasts Shake Baghdad After Sunset
AP - 17 minutes ago
· Allies Push Within 150 Miles of Baghdad
AP - 41 minutes ago
· Anti-War Protesters Rally Across Globe
AP - 1 hour, 1 minute ago
Special Coverage





Maj. Gen. Stanley McChrystal of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said forces had moved 150 miles into Iraqi territory. "The forces have moved with impressive speed thus far," he said.

In Basra, they faced artillery and machine-gun fire. So rather than risk a bloody urban battlefield in a city of 2 million, the allies took what they needed — an airport and a bridge — and moved on, leaving British forces behind.

"This is about liberation, not occupation," Gen. Tommy Franks said.

In Umm Qasr, they faced street-to-street fighting against guerrillas, among them members of Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s Fedayeen, the Baath Party paramilitary organization. "It's easy to sit in a window and fire a rifle," said Lt. Col. Chris Vernon, a British military spokesman.

Some had changed into civilian clothing to blend in with the population, Vernon said, taking advantage of allied desire to minimize civilian casualties.

"The Americans would actually say, `We've seen this guy, we let him go, and here he pops up again fighting," Vernon said.

Some troops stayed behind to mop up, so the port at Umm Qasr would be secure for humanitarian shipments. Skirmishes continued; a dozen miles north of Umm Qasr, Marines engaged a couple of Iraqi tanks and light armored vehicles.

Echo company's 1st Platoon of the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit saw action when it tried to clear bunkers near Umm Qasr.

"There was smoke everywhere. It's our first time in Iraq (news - web sites), and you see these four guys walking toward you with their hands up. We knew they were surrendering," said platoon leader Lt. William Todd Jacobs, 24, of Cincinnati.

"But then somebody shouts, 'There's two in the hole! There's two in the hole!'" Jacobs said.

The Marines reacted immediately, and shot both, then threw in a grenade that blew a plume of sand and black smoke out of the bunker.

There were reports of other skirmishes. Iraqi state television reported fighting between Iraqi and U.S.-British forces near the Shiite holy city of Najaf, 95 miles south of Baghdad. It said Nayif Shindakh Samir, the official in charge of the Baath party organizations in Najaf, was killed.

For the first time, F/A-18 Hornets launched from the USS Kitty Hawk dropped bombs; in hundreds of missions in the war's first three days, they were called off targets because ground forces took them without a fight.

On Saturday, four Hornets from the Kitty Hawk's Golden Dragons squadron reported dropping seven laser-guided bombs on artillery pieces at Al-Qurnah, north of Basra, in support of the advancing 1st Marine Expeditionary Force, said Lt. j.g. Nicole Kratzer, spokeswoman for the ship's air wing.

One pilot, Lt. John Allison of Corpus Christi, Texas, recalled the flash he saw on his screen. "That was it," he said. "I saw a big explosion. I saw it (the bunker) go away."

At Az Zubayr, near Basra, U.S. Marines and Iraqi forces battled through the night, leaving husks of Iraqi military trucks along the road.



One charred flatbed truck, windows gone and tires reduced to black dust, was left smoking. The hundreds of Kalashnikov rifles it carried were broken into pieces, their wood stocks shattered, their magazine clips strewn about the road.

The truck's batteries had already been removed by looters.

Farther down, the road was blocked by a truck that had been hauling an artillery piece until a tank shell crushed it. Another truck was in flames, its driver mostly burned to ashes.

The Marines of the 3rd Battalion, 7th Regiment engaged Iraq's 32 Mechanized Infantry Brigade, or at least what was left of it — according to the Marines, 60 percent of the brigade had deserted before the Americans even got there.

The remainder, about 300 men, fought from room to room in pockets of a dozen each against Marines scouring their barracks and headquarters.

The desertions were not unusual. Franks, the commander, said 1,000 to 2,000 prisoners were in custody, and thousands of others had deserted.

Not far from Umm Qasr, nine Iraqi soldiers fled Marine tank fire and drove their Nissan pickup truck up to a U.S. military convoy to surrender. Some waved a large white flag as they stood in the truck's bed; there were teenagers and older men, all dressed in civilian clothes.

Hundreds of tanks and armored vehicles lined Highway 80 — the road to Basra, nicknamed the "Highway of Death" during the 1991 Gulf War (news - web sites) when U.S. airstrikes wiped out an Iraqi military convoy fleeing Kuwait.

The roadside was dotted with Iraqi tanks blackened by direct hits on their dirt bunkers. White flags flew over some deserted, dilapidated barracks, including one where a white cloth had been hung over a picture of Saddam Hussein.

At one of the barracks, Iraqis emerged to surrender, stumbling across a rutted field clutching bags of belongings. As Marines moved toward them, the Iraqis knelt in the field with their arms crossed behind their heads.

Elsewhere groups of Iraqi men in civilian clothes stood near the highway. Allied officers believed they were Iraqi soldiers who had fled their barracks and changed from their uniforms before Marines and British forces arrived.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Army's V Corps took Nasiriyah, northwest of Basra, said U.S. Navy (news - web sites) Capt. Frank Thorp, a spokesman for Central Command.

Just outside Nasiriyah, traffic along the U.S. military supply route — flatbeds, Humvees and other vehicles — was so heavy it sometimes came to a standstill, a massive jam extending back to the Kuwait border.

There, much of the allied forces waited Saturday in long columns of vehicles to cross into Iraq. It did not escape their notice that they might be an inviting target for enemy fire.

"It would be tragic if the Iraqis had some artillery," said 2nd Lt. Sarah Skinner of Vassar, Mich., a platoon leader.



To: calgal who wrote (4959)3/22/2003 8:32:23 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 8683
 
Poll: Public Optimistic About Quick War
Sat Mar 22, 3:40 PM ET
By The Associated Press

URL:http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=540&ncid=70...

Public optimism that the war against Iraq (news - web sites) will be successful and short has grown in the last week, now that the war is under way, a new poll suggests.

A CBS-New York Times tracking poll, out Saturday, suggested that almost two-thirds, 62 percent, say the war will be quick and successful, and 33 percent thought it would take a long time and be costly. In early March, only four in 10 said they thought the war would be quick.

By a 2-1 margin, people now say that removing Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) is worth the cost.

About two-thirds in the poll said the Bush administration has not explained how much the war will cost. And about the same number, 64 percent, said that anti-war protest marches should be allowed. Fewer than half felt such marches should be allowed during the Persian Gulf War (news - web sites) in 1991.

American approval of President Bush (news - web sites) generally has increased since the war started. Two-thirds approve of his overall job performance and his handling of Iraq, while almost half now approve of his handling of the economy, up from four in 10 early this month.

A majority, 53 percent, now say the country is on the right track, up from 35 percent who felt that way in early February.

The poll of 835 adults was taken Thursday and Friday and has an error margin of plus or minus 3 percentage points.



To: calgal who wrote (4959)3/22/2003 11:08:14 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8683
 
Bush's Posture: A Leader Apart
Distance From Details May Reflect Bid to Insulate President From Any Early Setbacks
By Mike Allen and Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 22, 2003; Page A26

The White House portrayed President Bush this week as a wartime CEO at a dignified remove from the twists and turns of the attack on Iraq, with his staff insisting that he pays little attention to the televised bombing.

Administration officials report that Bush vetted the war plan before handing off its execution to the Pentagon. That is consistent with Bush's longtime image as a delegator more concerned about the big picture than about details.

But analysts say the decision inside the White House to accentuate that image in the opening days of the war also looked like an effort to insulate Bush from temporary setbacks while setting him up for credit if the invasion ends as the big success his aides say they expect.

The packaging was similar to the White House's approach during Afghanistan, when Bush emphasized his patience and made it clear that he was not worried, even when his aides began to doubt the strategy and wrangle privately.

For the second day in a row, White House officials invited journalists to photograph Bush at work, but he curtly waved off their questions about how the first strikes were going and told them to ask Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

"The president is not going to be a play-by-play commentator," White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said. "The president has a long approach to this."

Bush's aides, contending he is setting an example for the country by hewing to his routines, said he was not wakened to be told of the first casualties in the war, reported by networks and news services at 10 p.m. Thursday. An official said Bush was told yesterday during the 6 a.m. phone call in which national security adviser Condoleezza Rice updates him on overnight developments.

A senior administration official said that while working on a war speech on the flight back from last weekend's summit in the Azores, Bush took a break to watch "Conspiracy Theory," the Mel Gibson movie.

Bush has told visitors he is sleeping well and exercising regularly. And the official said Bush has given up desserts to try to bring down his running time. "In these type of times, he becomes even more disciplined than usual," the official said.

The official said Bush's executive style was on display during the Situation Room meeting Wednesday that ended with Bush giving the order to execute Operation Iraqi Freedom. The official said Bush used a video link with eight commanders in the Persian Gulf region to ask each one , "Do you have everything you need to win? And are you comfortable and pleased with the strategy?"

Bush's longtime aides feel strongly that one of his biggest political assets is his image as a down-home Texas rancher, despite his privileged upbringing and two Ivy League degrees. Their description of Bush in briefings and interviews this week set him in sharp contrast to several predecessors -- Richard M. Nixon the loner, Jimmy Carter the micromanager and Lyndon B. Johnson, who was so emotionally tortured by the Vietnam War that he would visit the West Wing at midnight or telephone the Situation Room at 5 a.m.

Fred I. Greenstein, a presidential historian at Princeton University, said Bush's posture of distance from the war may be recalibrated in coming days. "It could make him seem out of touch," Greenstein said. "And it may not do him justice because every evidence is that his learning curve since 9/11 has been dramatic."

At his briefing yesterday, Fleischer was asked whether Bush had watched any of the footage of the missile attacks on Baghdad, which the military calls the "shock and awe" phase of a campaign designed to intimidate the enemy.

"Obviously, the president, having authorized the mission, was aware of the mission, knew when it would begin," Fleischer said. "The president of the United States did not need to watch TV to understand what the American people think about the decision to use force to disarm the Iraqi regime."

Reporters were so puzzled by Fleischer's answer that he was asked nine questions about the subject. Later, a Bush spokesman called to say Bush had very briefly watched the shock-and-awe coverage in his study with White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr.

As his father did on the first weekend of the 1991 Persian Gulf War, Bush is spending the first weekend of the war at Camp David. White House officials stressed that the compound is equipped with the latest electronic communications, and said that Bush's senior advisers, including Rumsfeld, would travel there to attend a National Security Council meeting this morning. To underscore the point, White House officials plan to release a photo of the meeting.

In keeping with the White House determination to leave all substantive information on the progress of the war to Pentagon officials, either Rumsfeld or Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will appear on all five major Sunday television talk shows.

Although Bush remained largely out of view, senior members of the administration and department spokesmen sought to emphasize disarray in the Iraqi leadership and U.S. interest in the welfare of Iraqi civilians.

Rumsfeld, at the same time he denounced the leadership in Baghdad and called on Iraqi forces to surrender, emphasized that the U.S. war plan was designed to spare as many innocent civilians as possible. As viewers around the world watched live pictures of the bombardment, Rumsfeld insisted there was "no comparison" between what was happening in Iraq and the bombing campaigns that wiped out cities in Germany and Japan in World War II.

"The weapons that are being used today have a degree of precision that no one ever dreamt of in a prior contact," Rumsfeld said. Television images, he added, could show only slices of the war, "that particularized perspective that that reporter, or that commentator or that television camera happens to be able to see at that moment."

Fleischer made the same point. "The president's approach is to gather the information about what is happening in its totality," he said. "The president does not watch a lot of TV."

© 2003 The Washington Post Company

URL:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7838-2003Mar21.html