Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eashoa' M'sheekha who wrote (85077)	3/22/2003 11:31:26 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

This question will raise its ugly head looking for answers if things continue this way and nothing of consequence is found in Iraq It will raise its ugly head even after chem and bio weapons are found in Iraq. Bear in mind, KC, that this argument has nothing to do with whether Saddam actually has chem or bio weapons. If we are dealing in the world of simple facts, everybody knows that he has them. Even France admitted as much with M. de Villepin said inspections were good enough because his programs had been "contained". Saddam's conspicuous ties to terrorists, both foreign and home-grown, will also be revealed (e.g., what was that senior Palestinian terrorist doing in Saddam's bunker?). That won't matter either. Because the argument is no longer about the facts of Iraq, if it ever was. It is about the nature of American power.