Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Win Lose or Draw : Be A Steve, Make A Call -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Softechie who wrote (7674)	3/23/2003 1:12:31 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11447

It is just another example of the administration that when it speaks you have to throw a dart at a dart board divided into narrow slices of truth and lie, at best you have 50/50 chance they have spoken truth. They lie on political/global matters of importance EASILY, where as Clinton lied on whether he had a BJ or not--LOl! which is MORE dangerous??? The market was so hyped by Rummy speak('i am trying to locate the leadership of Iraq to have them surrender') they had some speculators thinking the war might be over by Sunday night and i better buy, but now matters have different feel. PPT better be on alert, would not be surprised if i see a PPT futures jam up starting about 6a.m. EST---we will see. I am beginning to suspect the administration is howling so much about civilian shields they are trying to get we good old americans to say, hey then let's blow-up the civilians too, as those Iraqi Troops are war criminals.(that is defined as TWISTED/SICKO logic) Now picture NYC under super atack by a fantasy super power with deadly accurate weapons and do you think there will be signs saying "Civilians here ONLY(and no troops within 500 yards") and "Troops here ONLY(and no civilians within 500yards)" as we want the troops to be easily blown up as it is fair play ??? pleeese. Max