SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jerrel Peters who wrote (376841)3/23/2003 12:10:22 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
We need the UN for many-many things. Don't be myoptic.
Peacekeeping is a huge job. We already have troops in 70+ nations and they are spread too thin. Adding the huge task of policing Iraq strains our system. We need Arab-speaking peacekeepers from the UN especially.

We also need the UN for food programmes, environmental programmes, doing a lot of the dirty humanitarian work of the third world, keeping in touch with the realities of the world, putting pressures on potential enemies who dont have tons of oil (making and invasion potentially pay for itself), etc. etc.

The Bush administration belittles the UN but they're key to the earth's management. Yes, sometimes we will strike without their approval, but that kind of thing ought to be kept to a minimum. After Iraq, in self-defense only, imminent danger to the US, that sort of thing. As this war gets complicated and messy you can feel the wrath of the world against us. If we had the UN behind us now no amount of Iraqi propaganda would hurt our image because we'd be 100% legitimate as we were during the Gulf War. And this incursion by Turkey could be worked out too.

American co do amazing things on its own, but not everything. We cant afford to. Nor should we want to. The right-wing has always dissed the UN so their voices are being heard loudly these days, but the vast majority of Americans would much prefer we work with the UN whenever possible.



To: Jerrel Peters who wrote (376841)3/23/2003 2:33:12 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
LOL. Well, there is that. I think it did expose the U.N. for what it is: a debating society. However, the exposure of the fact that we now don't really have an international body that is effective is going to be something to address after this war is over.