SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tcmay who wrote (173754)3/23/2003 1:22:11 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
If an absolute national emergency exists, perhaps extenuating circumstances exist. Neither Korea nor Vietnam were national emergencies: they were wars of opportunity, wars created by politicians whose sons were not draftable.

In the case of a real national emergency everybody volunteers anyway. Sortof the 911 effect. Thats what we are seeing with these iraqi divisions... how naive of our leaders not to have known this would happen, irrespective of whether SH is a tyrant.

And rebuilding these nations will help our economy,

What is the argument for that again? Do they intend to open the floodgates on iraqi oil and actually generate a surplus such that iraq is paying its own bills? Because from what I read it will be years before the iraqi oilfields are producing optimally.



To: tcmay who wrote (173754)3/23/2003 3:28:35 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tim,

re: I disagree completely. Drafting soldiers is involuntary servitude

I was speaking pragmatically. If the citizens of this country think a war is so important, let them risk their own life, or the lives of their own sons or daughters. It's a little too easy to send "volunteers" into these situations.

The patriots that have never fought a war, sitting in their living rooms, watching the war on TV...

John



To: tcmay who wrote (173754)3/24/2003 4:19:34 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:"My number was "181""

I was "3"...I'll never forget the day when they matched the numbers.

Jim