Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sojourner Smith who wrote (1659)	3/23/2003 2:48:39 PM
From: Karen Lawrence	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21614

LOLOLOL

To: Sojourner Smith who wrote (1659)	3/23/2003 3:26:17 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

Sojourner, I'm open to the idea that Saddam might be keeping some chemical weapons. But it's also my belief that they're not in sufficient quantities so as to take over the world, or the Middle East even. His direct neighbors probably feel the same way. What's problematic here is that this invasion, should Saddam be holding back some for defensive purposes, could cause him to use them in the Battle of Baghdad. By the way, wasn't he supposed to have been storing some awful stuff at those western Iraqi airbases, now under US control? Did they find anything? Remember, this war went into full force without Bush showing any beef.