Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Techplayer who wrote (33956)	3/23/2003 11:06:46 PM
From: PuddleGlum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

I think Friday's gains could go away quite easily. SPX down to 825-850, Naz down to 1325-1350 are both reasonable downside targets, IMO. But those targets don't fit with my pseudo-stoch and Williams%R observations. Those observations point to just a day or three of downside potential (which would still make you happy, I think). I'd love to see 1325-1350 in the Naz so that I could exit my QQQ puts (Woe is me! I didn't aggressively follow my indicator.)

To: Techplayer who wrote (33956)	3/24/2003 7:39:19 AM
From: orkrious	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

great piece. thanks for posting it

To: Techplayer who wrote (33956)	3/24/2003 9:31:04 AM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

fas.org i really had to LOL when i read the author of the report you linked seemed so distressed at the end of the UN as we know it. this statement viewed and read in juxtaposition to the above link is most naive and amusing: There is now currently no serious framework to resolve disputes among countries except war... setting us back oh I'd say 50-70 years... and the US has indicated to the world that if you feel threatened, it's ok to bomb your neighbor and take it over. That's the reality people. A reasonable person might conclude that this will point to... more war. That's certainly where I think it points. the UN as a means of mitigating and preventing wars since its inception has been a colossal failure. "serious framework" to resolve disputes. too funny.