Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (29985)	3/24/2003 12:51:08 AM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Hi elmat - Wolfowitz & Perle are IN the Defense department. They have policy positions today. They can TELL people what to do, and make policy. In think tanks, they would be advisers, not decsion makers. Conservative mainstream / Corporate Heritage AEI Hoover Institute liberterion / conservative Catto Judicial Watch Tehnical oriented, ocassional conservative - Hudson Insittute Manhattan Insitute Mainstream Liberal Brookings Harvard School of Government and a whole bunch of others Council on Foreign Realtions mostly goes here, but more a talking shop. Liberal to 'left' (sort of corporate internationalist left, pro-globalization) Policies tend to be leftist domestically and corparatist for rest of world. Ford Foundation Pew Memorial trust Carnegie Peace, Education Fundations *********** Failure of Brookings, CFR, and others to be aware of the post COld War environment & and articulate a coherent and PRACTICAL foreign policy has lead to the the rise of Wolfowitz, Perle and other neo-cons. After collaspse of the Soviet Union, foreign policy has drifted. Part of this is reasonable, since the situations weren't clear until about mid -1990s. Managing the transition to a free Central Europe was a question mark, Russia under Yeltsin was a bit of a wild card, etc.