SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (5132)3/24/2003 10:35:19 AM
From: calgal  Respond to of 8683
 
URL:http://www.jewishworldreview.com/toons/ramirez/ramirez1.asp



To: calgal who wrote (5132)3/24/2003 10:37:13 AM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8683
 
Linda Chavez

URL:http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/chavez.html




As one who held an elected position at the UN, I'm certain it's time for America to leave

newsandopinion.com | It's time the United States considers quitting the United Nations. In the past, only the right-wing fringe argued for pulling out of the U.N., which, after all, was created in 1945, not only with the United States' blessing, but largely at our urging.



In the nearly 58 years since, the U.N. has had, at best, a mixed role in preventing and resolving conflict. More often it has served as a debating society, whose member states were as likely to ignore as to adhere to the very covenants, declarations and resolutions they voted to adopt.

I say this as someone who has observed the workings of the United Nations firsthand. From 1992-1996, I served as the U.S. expert to the U.N. human rights subcommission, a position to which the U.N. human rights commission elected me. Each August for four years, I traveled to Geneva to participate as a voting member of the subcommission, whose role it was to hear testimony concerning human rights violations around the world.

Though we rarely were able to reach consensus about grotesque violations in countries such as China or Cuba, my fellow subcommission members had no trouble condemning the United States for its alleged transgressions, especially our supposed racism. Among the 18 subcommission members, only the British, Ukrainian and Belgian representatives were stalwart friends. Even the Belgian representative reflected his personal rather than his government's views, which he was entitled to do since each of us was supposed to act as "independent" experts. The French delegate was viscerally hostile to anything American; the Norwegian was sanctimonious; the Latin Americans were usually cowardly; the Africans, East Europeans and Arabs, frequently duplicitous.

Nothing about the recent U.N. back-stabbing over Iraq has surprised me. The real question is why we put up with it. What exactly has the United Nations accomplished in recent years that we could not have done on our own? The Gulf War, though sanctioned by the U.N., was almost entirely an American effort, with the usual help from the Brits and a handful of other nations. The U.N. has failed miserably in preventing horrific mass murder in Rwanda, the Balkans and Cambodia. It has been totally ineffective in promoting peace in the Middle East, engaging in vicious slurs against Israel while coddling thugs like Yasser Arafat. It has been unable to prevent terrorism anywhere.

Meanwhile, the United States is expected to bear a ridiculous share of the cost of operating the United Nations. The U.N. assesses dues based on the member country's relative share of the world's economy. Since the U.S. economy represents about a quarter of the world's economy, we're expected to pay 25 percent of the costs of running the bloated, frequently corrupt U.N. bureaucracy. We're also expected to share an even greater burden of the U.N. peacekeeping budget. The United State's failure to pay its full dues -- we've been as much as a half billion dollars behind in recent years -- causes much consternation among elite opinion leaders here and abroad.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal this week, American Enterprise Institute scholar Joshua Muravchik argued that France's veto threat actually rescued the United States from a serious blunder, namely creating "a presumption that Security Council approval is the necessary prerequisite for the use of American force abroad," which he claimed "would have posed incalculable dangers to world peace in the long term."

Muravchik is right. The best way to be sure that we never be tempted to do so in the future would be to withdraw our support altogether. If we are not prepared to do that, we could at least continue to withhold payments, give our excellent U.N. ambassador John Negroponte a new job befitting his talents, and downgrade our representation and participation in this feckless institution. Pretending that the United Nations is worthy of our unqualified support is not in our nation's best interest.



To: calgal who wrote (5132)3/24/2003 4:43:53 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8683
 
Russian Military Sales to Iraq Disturbs Washington







Monday, March 24, 2003


WASHINGTON — Russian President Vladimir Putin promised President Bush that he would investigate reports that Russian companies sold sensitive military equipment to Iraq in violation of decade-old U.N. sanctions, the White House reported Monday.





In a morning telephone call to Putin, Bush raised his concerns over reports that Russians are actually on the ground in Iraq teaching Iraqi forces how to use prohibited hardware like night vision goggles, GPS jammers and anti-tank guided missiles, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said.

"President Putin assured President Bush that he would look into it. And President Bush said he looked forward to hearing the results," Fleischer told reporters.

"We have concerns. Those concerns have been expressed at the highest levels, and these concerns have been expressed repeatedly over the last -- quite some little while," Fleischer added.

A source told Fox News the GPS jammers in particular have slowed the bombing of Baghdad as the military has taken extra care to avoid hitting civilian targets.

Fleischer said senior U.S. government officials have repeatedly discussed with Russian counterparts over the past year how they can get the suspected companies to cut cooperation with the Iraqis.

On Monday, Russian officials denied that Russia had sold any equipment to Iraq.

"We did not send any goods, including military ones, that violated the sanctions," Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov told reporters. "No fact supporting the Americans' anxiety has been found."

Ivanov said the United States had requested reports on the alleged illicit sales several times since October, with Russia making its most recent report on March 17. If there were any indication that Russian companies had shipped such goods, it would be investigated as a serious violation of Russian law, he added.

Fox News confirmed Sunday a report that three Russian companies were involved in military equipment sales. U.N. sanctions have allowed Iraq only to import goods approved by the oil-for-food program.

The State Department said it had raised the issue with senior Russian officials several times, particularly over the past two weeks, because the equipment could pose a direct threat to coalition forces. The United States even provided specific information regarding the transactions to Moscow in hopes the Russians would rein in the dealers.

Secretary of State Colin Powell told Fox News that he is not prepared to say that Russia is not being straight with the United States, but he is concerned about Russia's refusal to take action.

"Foreign Minister Ivanov assured me that with enough information and the right information, they would do something about it, but frankly, we have given them more than enough information so that should be able to find out the truth of this, and I am quite confident of our facts on this matter, very confident of our facts," Powell said.

Fleischer said that while the Russian action is troublesome, he did not blame the government, but Russian companies. However, officials note that the Russian government has to certify the export of materials like those cited, though they may have been shipped through a third country.

Ukraine has been named as one nation that has sold radar equipment to Iraq in violation of sanctions. Andrei Kokoshin, a former head of the Russian Security Council, said he was "100 percent" sure that Russian companies had not sold prohibited equipment to Iraq, but said the Ukraine may have re-sold materials first purchased from Russia.

Ivanov said that any companies that would have shipped such goods would be in violation of Russian law. He said Russia sent the United States a report as recently as March 17, discussing alleged illicit sales that have been the target of U.S. concern since October.

The U.S. government suspects that the Russians were hiding some jamming equipment in humanitarian aid flights to Baghdad, Fox News has learned. The boxes are about 3 ft. by 3 ft.

Moscow analysts discount the reports as rumor, and say the accusations are an attempt to discredit Russia for its refusal to back a war against Iraq.

"It seems to me it is just an attempt to put pressure on Russia and make the position of Russia in regard to Iraq softer," said Anton Khlopkov, an analyst at Moscow's PIR nonproliferation think tank.

Also Monday, Russian President Vladimir Putin called on Iraq to obey international conventions on the humane treatment of prisoners of war after 12 American soldiers were ambushed and believed captured or killed.

Putin told top Cabinet ministers that he had asked the Foreign Ministry "to appeal to Iraq with an urgent request to comply with these particular rules."

On Sunday, The Washington Post identified two of the firms that allegedly sold equipment as KBP Tula and Aviaconversiya, a Moscow-based company. It said KBP supplied antitank guided missiles and Aviaconversiya provided jamming devices.

Aviaconversiya director Oleg Antonov denied the claim, saying on Echo of Moscow radio that, "we have never delivered anything to Iraq."

He said the allegation was "conjecture resulting from the fact that tests of high-precision armaments revealed the total loss of their efficiency against our jamming."

The deputy director of Tula's instrument design office, Leonid Roshal, also denied the report, according to the news agency ITAR-Tass.

A spokesman for Russia's arms export agency, Rosoboronexport, said his organization "100 percent definitely had nothing to do with any sales and we have no information that such sales took place."

Rosoboronexport is the sole state intermediary for Russian military exports and imports.

A spokesman for the U.S. embassy in Moscow said that Moscow's response to the allegations "so far hasn't been satisfactory."

"We hope that the responsible Russian agencies will take our concerns seriously," he said.

Fox News reported in January that Iraq may have obtained as many as 400 electronic "jammers" that could throw America's smart bombs off their programmed path if the U.S. goes to war.

There was "real concern at the highest levels" at the Pentagon that Baghdad may have purchased the jammers from a Russian firm, a senior defense official said then.

If the smart bombs are diverted from their designated targets, they may hit non-military sites and cause civilian casualties — which could be used to Iraq's advantage.

The types of bombs whose courses may be altered by these jammers are called J-Dams — for "joint direct attack munitions," guided by global satellites. These are the military's GPS-guided bombs. Each one costs about $21,000 and has a maximum range of 15 miles. J-Dams made their combat debut in Kosovo in 1999.

It is estimated that 80 percent of U.S. weapons that would be used in a war with Iraq would be directed via satellites.

The Air Force is now trying to test similar jammers to see if those used by an enemy can really work on U.S. weapons.

Defense officials confirm the extensive use of GPS-guided munitions, including Tomahawks, JDAMs, and the EGBU-27 used to hit the Iraqi leadership compound on Wednesday night. These are all being used throughout the country. All of the munitions used in Baghdad have been GPS-guided.

Fox News' Teri Schultz and Wendell Goler and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

URL:http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,82018,00.html