Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (2311)	3/24/2003 11:55:20 AM
From: Karen Lawrence	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 21614

What wmds has he used in the war, so far NOTHING. This war is going badly. It was predicted that everything would have to go right for it to be a success. And everything has NOT gone right. Wall Street dropped off the precipice again today, because they were expecting a quick, decisive victory.

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (2311)	3/24/2003 12:08:47 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Respond to of 21614

How would you have disarmed Saddam without war? Or are you OK with him having WMD's that he is very likely to use against the free world and maybe even some of your friends and family members. Please don't say inspections. They were tried for a very long time. Inspections = appeasement. Appeasement never works. Just ask the millions of Jews who were gassed in Germany and Poland while the allies were building up for invasion and then following through with that invasion. The only reason Saddam doesn't have nuclear weapons now is due to his having grossly miscalculated the world's response to his invasion of Kuwait. If he hadn't undertaken that invasion, it's safe to say he'd have nukes by now, and likely would have used them.